Sharly is a document research workspace that brings cross-file questions and source-aware responses into one interface. Its most valuable use is identifying disagreements between documents without silently smoothing them into a false consensus.
Product identity and supported workflows
The vendor describes uploading PDFs, documents, spreadsheets and links, then asking questions across them. It also advertises citation-aware chat, answer modes grounded in uploads and team permission controls. Product demos do not constitute external verification of extraction precision.
Who it is for and the decision it addresses
A compliance team can compare two policy versions and ask which obligations changed. Researchers can review competing forecasts while keeping assumptions and dates distinct instead of asking a model to declare which estimate is correct.
Step-by-step first evaluation
Upload two non-confidential reports that explicitly disagree on a numeric forecast. Request a two-column table with page-level source references and note each document’s assumptions. Reopen both originals and check the values; then ask the assistant to separate direct citations from its own reconciliation or explanatory suggestions.
Failure modes and limitations
Word processor tables and embedded charts may be difficult to extract reliably. Vendor claims of encryption and performance are not an independently conducted audit. A source citation identifies a location, not proof that the model has interpreted the passage correctly.
Privacy, permissions, licensing and governance
The company says it offers role-based access and encrypted storage, but users must confirm the current contract, relevant processing locations, retention and permitted integrations. Do not upload legal or medical client records as a demonstration.
Exports, retention and avoiding lock-in
Save the documents and a revision-controlled evidence sheet outside Sharly. Copying the final narrative alone loses the source context; ensure its quoted passages and links remain accessible under organization-approved rights.
Alternatives and team boundaries
ChatDOC emphasizes clickable PDF locations; Hebbia emphasizes enterprise analytic tables. Sharly is more relevant when the first question is reconciling several uploaded reports.
What remains unverified for each country, version and plan
This October 25, 2026 profile reflects dated first-party product documentation, not independent hands-on testing or an endorsement. Exact country availability, model versions, accessibility provisions, seat entitlements, enterprise residency, retention settings and the whole supported language matrix vary by configuration. Where a plan/region/date combination was not verified with its exact original source, it is left unknown, not assumed worldwide. The product may have changed since the documented feature appeared.
Pricing and evidence boundary
No subscription price, usage allowance, API token rate, special promotional plan, success benchmark or commercial license is asserted here. A dated pricing reference covers independently time-stamped pricing snapshots. Product brochures are supplier claims; human reviewers must check linked evidence against the actual source and retain their own decision trail. No screenshots, borrowed brand assets or pretend product tests are included. Specialist model, media, coding and autonomous-agent deep dives belong to their designated teams.
Sources & Further Reading
Primary vendor documentation accessed 2026-10-25; market-specific terms and feature rollout require additional verification. These sources support stated vendor-product claims, not an independent quality score.