Harvey is a professional legal AI platform, not a substitute for a lawyer checking the law. Its Vault and shared knowledge facilities make the source corpus and access model central purchasing decisions.
Product identity and supported workflows
Harvey describes a Vault for legal files, email material and queries; knowledge bases can hold precedents and playbooks. Its platform also offers agents and spaces, but configuring autonomous procedures is a separate the agent-security and orchestration guide topic. A licensed research source does not mean unrestricted reuse of its content.
Who it is for and the decision it addresses
Law firms and in-house teams may use a bounded collection of contracts to draft an issue list, or investigate how a clause appears across transaction documents. The human reviewer must decide whether the supporting document has the right version, jurisdiction, parties and date.
Step-by-step first evaluation
Create a test Vault with public sample agreements, label document versions and keep the original files. Ask for exceptions to an assignment clause across the corpus. Open every source identified in the draft, mark missing or ambiguous clauses, and escalate anything requiring interpretation. Only then test limited connector access to an approved document repository.
Failure modes and limitations
Bulk document review can miss scanned attachments, annexes and conflicting versions. Harvey advertises permissions and ethical-wall enforcement, but a firm must test matter-level rules against its own systems. A summary or extracted comparison is not professional legal advice and should not be given to clients without attorney approval.
Privacy, permissions, licensing and governance
The vendor publishes security commitments and ethical-wall controls. Obtain contractual terms, retention, country-specific processing details and a verified list of approved connector permissions before uploading privileged client files; public security pages alone cannot guarantee an individual contract.
Exports, retention and avoiding lock-in
Archive the reviewed issue list, original files and passage-level evidence in the firm document management system. Vault sharing is not proof of permanent export rights or retrieval after termination; check both terms and the connector source of truth.
Alternatives and team boundaries
CoCounsel and Lexis+ with Protégé are adjacent legal research products; Hebbia emphasizes analytic matrices across evidence. All require a jurisdiction- and corpus-specific evaluation rather than unsupported winner ratings.
What remains unverified for each country, version and plan
This October 25, 2026 profile reflects dated first-party product documentation, not independent hands-on testing or an endorsement. Exact country availability, model versions, accessibility provisions, seat entitlements, enterprise residency, retention settings and the whole supported language matrix vary by configuration. Where a plan/region/date combination was not verified with its exact original source, it is left unknown, not assumed worldwide. The product may have changed since the documented feature appeared.
Pricing and evidence boundary
No subscription price, usage allowance, API token rate, special promotional plan, success benchmark or commercial license is asserted here. A dated pricing reference covers independently time-stamped pricing snapshots. Product brochures are supplier claims; human reviewers must check linked evidence against the actual source and retain their own decision trail. No screenshots, borrowed brand assets or pretend product tests are included. Specialist model, media, coding and autonomous-agent deep dives belong to their designated teams.
Sources & Further Reading
- Vault knowledge and document sharing
- Security and ethical walls
- Current agent capabilities require a separate detailed agent-design review
Primary vendor documentation accessed 2026-10-25; market-specific terms and feature rollout require additional verification. These sources support stated vendor-product claims, not an independent quality score.